Search for: "State v Shaw" Results 901 - 920 of 1,145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Shaw Rose Nets, LLC, 597 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, issued an opinion on March 18, 2011, styled, Brenda LeMeilleur v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm by George Lenard
Gerald Maatman, of Seyfarth & Shaw LLP, is quoted as stating that, rather than being pro-employee, the Court is “pro-interpretation” of the USERRA and “very protective of due process. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:50 am by Genevieve P. Rapadas
" The doctrine, which makes orders denying motions for class certification immediately appealable, was originally adopted by the California Supreme Court in Daar v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 2006) (affirming the district court's finding of infringement by equivalence and stating that separate patentability of the accused pharmaceutical formulation did not outweigh substantial evidence of its equivalence); Fiskars, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am by Chris Cheatham
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:49 am by Chris Cheatham
Up until yesterday, the biggest green building dispute I had come across was Shaw Development v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:11 am by D. Scott Crook
Salt Lake City School District (Utah Jan. 28, 2011) (action for reimbursement of attorney fees from public school district based on Utah reimbursement statute) Shaw v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shaw & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 98 (04 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) (04 February 2011) Everton Football Club Company Ltd v Sail Group Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 126 (QB) (04 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Dias v London Borough of Havering [2011] EWHC 172 (Ch) (04 February 2011) Office of Fair Trading v… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:55 am by Charon QC
It was famously articulated in the speeches in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 – see particularly at [1913] AC 417, 438, 463 and 477, per Lord Haldane LC, Lord Atkinson, and Lord Shaw of Dunfermline respectively. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
  The lawyers for C & J (and Macy's) decide that Scott Shaw -- a young partner (and 2002 graduate of USC Law) will argue the case. [read post]