Search for: "State v. Barry"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined”… [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
Don't you wonder how this case would square with New York Times v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
Barry Friedman (New York University School of Law) has posted Discipline and Method: The Making of the Will of the People (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2010, p. 877-920) on SSRN. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
Cormier, Andrew Good, Barry C. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:43 pm
Van Camp v Van Camp (1921) 53 CA 17, 199 P 885; Pereira v Pereira (1909) 156 C 1, 103 P 488. 8. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm
The recently decided case of Barry v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
State Bar of California, Rust v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
Barry (1988) 485 U.S. 312, 322.) [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
Yes,” said Barry Helfand, Kim’s attorney. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:34 pm
Second, in Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
