Search for: "State v. Clayton"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm
In its report, the Georgia DOT found some marked - and perhaps surprising -- differences between the Atlanta Metro area, which it considered to be Clayton, Cobb, Fulton, DeKalb, and Gwinnett counties, and the rest of the state. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
While CRSP v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:13 pm
In November 2006, the city filed an action under federal and New York State antitrust laws to block the transaction. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
Cheevers v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United States.Certiorari… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
While many codes state that the nonconforming use must be “lawfully established,” they do not generally specify whether, to be “lawful,” the use must have complied only with land use regulations or with other laws as well.In McMilian v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Condliff’s barrister, Richard Clayton QC, presented two arguments. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
The defendants viewed the breadth of Clayton Act, Section 7 too narrowly. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
POL’Y 1, 51–57 (2010); Clayton E. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
How are signatory states to cope? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:39 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: Fast Break Foods LLC v. [read post]
