Search for: "State v. Day" Results 901 - 920 of 60,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Crawley v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:16 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Massi v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Hildebrand v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Luis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Following the jump, the cases are listed day by day, with a brief summary of the legal issues at stake. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm by Joshua Matz
The petition of the day is: Title: United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:27 pm by Zachary Spilman
Tuesday’s oral argument before CAAF in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:26 pm
United States [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] and The Boeing Company v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Director of the Department of Revenue of Montana v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:41 am by Marissa Miller
The petition of the day is: Title: Bobby v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
Regina (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “A failed asylum-seeker awaiting deportation whose detention had not been properly reviewed had been deprived of safeguards prescribed by law and was entitled to damages for false imprisonment. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:58 am
Regina (Davies) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Queen’s Bench Division “There was a need to introduce a requirement that claimants who wished to make a challenge under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should have to obtain the court's permission to do so. [read post]