Search for: "State v. Fan" Results 901 - 920 of 2,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court five days after the government filed its petition in Lee v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Jon Hyman
Circuit Court of Appeals in Heartland Plymouth Court MI v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The SubScribe blog has an analysis entitled “The Press and immigration: reporting the news or fanning the flames of hatred? [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 12:49 pm by Sasha Volokh
Those who are familiar with my work know that I’m no big fan of the California Rule. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 7:24 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This week, Daugerdas’ conviction and sentence were upheld, ensuring that the 65-year-old spends a few more years behind bars (United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
 The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
” with the hashtag #Rio2016, it may “raise the brand’s profile” as the USOC alleges, at least among Biles fans. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 10:08 am by Larry
United States, from the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am by Andrew Crocker and Nate Cardozo
We’re fans of transparency; we think technology policy should be subject to broad public debate, heavily informed by the views of technical experts. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]