Search for: "State v. Grounds"
Results 901 - 920
of 41,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:45 am
Press, 2024) [open access]- Scroll to p. 215Queering Displacement: The State of the Ukrainian LGBTQ+ Community During the Russian Full-Scale Invasion (Global Public Policy Institute, April 2024) [text via ReliefWeb]"The Sixth Ground: Why Adding Gender/Sexuality to the Grounds for Asylum Would Better Serve the Needs of LGBT Asylum Seekers," Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, vol. 38, no. 1 (Fall 2023) [full-text]- Focuses on the US.Transgender Immigrants in… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Leroy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
The case is entitled Carter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
United States patents are generally territorial. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
Important to note for client privacy purposes, a 501(c) (4) is not required to disclose the names of its donors.[13] However, depending on what state the 501(c)(4) operates, such information may be requested by such state, but public disclosure of donor information is still a grey area which is arguably invalid on federal or state constitutional grounds.[14] Florida does not currently expand any required federal disclosures, which may mean there is a desire by the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:32 am
The applicant stated that the employer had failed to prove that the applicant had the intention of not returning to work and therefore failed to prove that the applicant was guilty of absconding from work. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
" Option Three is a middle ground position. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:52 am
Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union obo Judas v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and others – (2024) 33 LC 1.11.6 also reported at [2024] 2 BLLR 138 (LC) [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:59 am
The court examined a 1907 Iowa case, Zinser v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
