Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
However, most shareholders won't have an opportunity this year to choose between the competing thresholds because many issuers are obtaining permission from the staff of Securities and Exchange Commission's Corporation Finance Division to omit the investor resolutions. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
(iv) Protecting whistleblowers is contrary to the values and beliefs imbedded in American culture: (v) Punishing and preventing bad corporate behavior is a difficult task, depending on moral condemnation and economic pain. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:24 am
Several of Strine’s recent extra-judicial writings focused on the influence (or sometimes lack of influence) of the big four fund complexes on corporate governance and how those funds’ decisions impact ordinary investors. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm
Menendez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Menendez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am
” Callaghan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
K 1335 F46 2006 Financial gatekeepers : can they protect investors? [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
Security Lien or Pledge of Ownership Interests If the lease does not expressly define the term “assignment” and there is no other express restriction in the lease to the contrary, the tenant may place a lien on its leasehold interest, or pledge its corporate ownership interests, in connection with a financing without the landlord’s consent. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
For starters, most insider trading is perfectly legal, such as when corporate executives buy stock in their own companies as an investment. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
’” Id. at *4 (quoting Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d at 1074; quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Such effects could be shown if the shares were traded on an American exchange or if fraudulent materials were sent to investors in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:53 pm
The SEC stated that it did not impose a penalty on the company because the company self-reported, agreed to compensate investors, and will register the tokens in compliance with securities laws. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The Madoff liquidation case is Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:03 pm
In addition to the first distribution in September 2011 which represented a roughly 4% payout, Madoff victims with allowed claims have also received up to $500,000 each from the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC"), which provides protection against the failure of registered broker-dealers. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
For example, the DOJ would potentially still be able to bring charges based on fact patterns similar to United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Some countries have opposed inclusion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions in the IIAs. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 1:18 pm
The court held that the Corporate Transparency Act likely exceeds Congress’s authority under the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:49 am
In a footnote to that passage, VC Will cites two Chancery Court decisions involving deadlocked corporations and one — Mehra v Teller — involving an LLC. [read post]
