Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
However, if the first interpretation is correct, this casts doubt on the applicability of Jacob LJ’s finding in Procter & Gamble that where a registration is “evidently for a shape… The proper comparison is with the shape of the alleged infringement. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court will begin to hear oral arguments for United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Beydoun, Electing Islamophobia, (March 6, 2016).Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Fragmented Oversight of Nonprofits in the United States: Does it Work? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
This is a fairly straightforward search and seizure case where the Second Circuit says the police were able to nail a guy for having an unlicensed gun at the wrong place at the wrong time.The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. indirect taxation distinction? [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
” Gottlieb v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
NYPD retiree “shared his happiness at scoring the disability pension, as well as his achievements running marathons” [New York Daily News] Scott Greenfield on public sector unionism and Friedrichs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 10:00 pm
When you spoliate data, you can lose even after you’ve won… :o) In Hausman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:37 pm
Cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:39 am
Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., January 13, 2016, Costa, G.). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:22 pm
It began with the State of the Nation controversy in February, when members of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) were removed forcibly from Parliament for persisting in asking when President Jacob Zuma would pay back the state funds spent on upgrading his homestead at Nkandla. [read post]
