Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 901 - 920
of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 7:05 pm
In Florida Power & Light Company, et al v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
In granting in part plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant's affirmative defenses for failure to state a claim, the court concluded that Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:38 am
As stated by the Texas Supreme Court in 1994, in Light v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:55 am
Washington, (Docket No. 17-108, vacated 6/25/2018), (Order List), granted certiorari, vacated the judgment below and remanded the case to the Washington Supreme Court in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:00 pm
In Hood v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Eric Fues at Finnegan Henderson recently wrote a great article (originally published in Patent World in June 07) about the utility of USITC proceedings in light of the US Supreme Court's May 2006 decision in eBay v MercExchange (which, if you have not been following US patent law, made it harder to obtain injunctions in patent cases).The USITC (United States International Trade Commission) is the US border protection agency, or, in the words of the USITC: An… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
" However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church & State… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church & State v City &… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:04 pm
Quinn and Burwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:22 pm
Ritchie v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Under Cheek v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Texas Monthly named state Rep. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
Written by: Andrew Royce Some alarm has been raised among the real estate bar by the recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit in Steven Weiss, Chapter 7 Trustee, v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
Finally, the state law tort claims fail for a similar failure to allege facts supporting proximate cause. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
