Search for: "State v. Liptak" Results 901 - 920 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at Roberts’ “competing impulses” comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
As an example of Realist interpretation, consider Justice Cardozo's decision in Steward Machine v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
 Meanwhile, Adam Liptak at the New York Times posted his own list of notable cases that the Court declined to hear. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
I also had some related and more wide-ranging discussion of the Court (and the state of our institutions more generally) with Bill Kristol on his show, Conversations with Kristol. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by CJLF Staff
  New York Times reporters Adam Liptak and Lisa Faye Petak have this story.Indiana Supreme Court Hears Argument on Convict Voting:  Charles Wilson of the AP reports the Indiana Supreme Court heard argument today in a case challenging the scope of a state law stripping the voting rights of those in jail. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
Adam Liptak of the New York Times, in news coverage of the decision, reports that, “[f]or the fourth time since April, the Supreme Court … made it harder for Americans to vote. [read post]