Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 901 - 920 of 42,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Let's explore this question by looking at some of the pleadings filed in Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:22 am by Steven Schwinn
  But some Justices suggested that this kind of vacuum would frustrate congressional purpose – to unify the national registration of sex offenders and to re-locate and register those many offenders that were lost under previous state and national registration schemes. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Much of the commentary around on Trump’s proposed national emergency has focused on the framework set out in Justice Robert Jackson’s deservedly famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by ipelton
BCS NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP The title game for the Bowl Champtionship Series is the “BCS National Championship. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am by Tom Smith
Consider future-Eleventh Circuit judge Rosemary Barkett’s ruling for a Florida appellate court in State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 347 (AAC) [not on Bailii yet] Just a quick note on this Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case, which found that the Art 12 Ibrahim/Teixeira rights applied to an A8 national who had been working under registration, but had not completed the 12 months before becoming unemployed and claiming Income Support. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 347 (AAC) [not on Bailii yet] Just a quick note on this Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case, which found that the Art 12 Ibrahim/Teixeira rights applied to an A8 national who had been working under registration, but had not completed the 12 months before becoming unemployed and claiming Income Support. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi displayed a bench still uncertain about how to resolve a problem about the Social Security benefits available to a small group of National Guard workers. [read post]