Search for: "State v. Ocean" Results 901 - 920 of 1,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
 There, as Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, described by the IPKat here, they were unceremoniously tossed back to the General Court for its further attention. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Anne’s, in Oceanside CA; and Holy Trinity, in Ocean Beach, CA (plaintiff in all three cases is the Diocese of San Diego). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
., Ocean Peace, Inc., and United States Seafoods, LLC, have each been fined by the EPA for violations of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
., Ocean Peace, Inc., and United States Seafoods, LLC, have each been fined by the EPA for violations of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am by M. Umberger
Although Guy Fawkes Day is celebrated an ocean away, the incident remains relevant today and raises many questions for governments to consider with respect to the relationship between states and their citizens. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:15 am
Ocean Beach Club, LLC, 2:11CV639, 2012 WL 4461289 (E.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]