Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 901 - 920 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
Shibutani Derelicts of Company K (1978) v. 200 How come..we have to live in this shit hole?... [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm by Larry
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
It traces the research process from the case that inspired the research (Bebb v. the Law Society [1914] 1 Ch 286) through to the creation of an entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and what this means for women's history, emphasizing the importance of asking the ‘woman question’ and seeking out the broader significance of a woman's life in the context of her times.Mara Malagodi, Ivor Jennings's Constitutional Legacy Beyond the… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
That is, that there must be a New Zealand copyright offence corresponding to the alleged US offence, despite argument that this principle may not apply under the New Zealand – United States Treaty 1970. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Graham Smith
"  Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The moral virtues are states of character concerned with choice; examples include courage, temperance and justice. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:49 am by Susan Brenner
State, supra (quoting The Compact Oxford English Dictionary 1529 (2d ed.1991) (emphasis added)). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:15 am by New Books Script
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2011 xxiii, 256 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:45 am by Barry Barnett
Oxford Health Plans LLC, 675 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 2012) (post here), and Jock v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in King v. [read post]