Search for: "State v. Queen"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Servs., P.C. v New York Cent. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada, as stated out in Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
There is a judgment on liability and quantum (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)), although Mr Justice Mann’s earlier decision dismissing Mr Clifford’s strike out application on limitation and triviality grounds (Burrell v Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch)) is arguably of wider importance. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
"[12] Both Queen City, Tominaga, and Mozart Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm
Our most recent in-depth human rights case comments: Removal of child following faulty diagnosis of injury breached Article 8 ((AD and OD v United Kingdom (Application No 28680/06)) Exceptionally serious circumstances must be established to resist extradition order says Supreme Court (Norris v United States ) EU Directive on Refugee status does not enhance asylum rights under Strasbourg Convention (The Queen on the Application of MK(Iran) v… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
The judgment in Sinkova v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:41 am
"Plaintiff stated a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 by alleging that defendant deceived or attempted to deceive the court with a fictitious letter addressed to him from the former licensing director of the City's Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) that stated, inter alia, that plaintiff was under a lifetime ban on owning any licenses with the TLC (see Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
Supreme Court’s decision, Obergefell v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am
On May 23, two distinguished Queen’s Counsel squared off before a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in a rare inter-state case on the court’s docket, Georgia v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:05 am
AHK and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1117 (Admin) – Read judgment Secrecy and secret justice are rarely out of the public eye. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm
Ct., Queens Co., decided 8/14/2015)Even with today's pervasive lawyer advertising, can't and don't lawyers still get to pick their clients? [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
In Schwartzman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Compare Cheema v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
., PLLC a/a/o Leon Regis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
See, Brothers v New York State Elec. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
