Search for: "State v. Rice"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm
It is USA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
[i] As a side note, all twenty were convicted and sentenced to between one and two years in prison, affirmed by People v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am
Evans (a prominent pastor in Dallas), and then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
James V. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am
Tam’ case below.http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2017/06/uspto-issues-new-examination-guideline.html * Matal v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
’” Devine states that the impact of the Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
See Patch v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm
‘If you rule this way, I’m not going to invite you to a State dinner’? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:31 am
If this error occurs, veterans can appeal for an earlier effective date and cite Rice v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
If this error occurs, veterans can appeal for an earlier effective date and cite Rice v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
Happy V-Day, everyone.This feed originates at the personal blog of Scott Lincicome (http://lincicome.blogspot.com). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
” See Miner v. [read post]
