Search for: "State v. So "
Results 901 - 920
of 117,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
Raul Adam Martinez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court in Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 2:25 am
Jessica Glendening of the Johnson County Public Defender Office won in State v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
The new Mississippi case grows out of a lawsuit that the state government pursued in its own name, but did so on behalf of a large number of consumers in the state. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:02 pm
I'm not so altruistic. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Faiure to do so dooms a legal malpractice defense later. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:53 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:58 pm
State Farm v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 7:07 am
So, in a murder/shooting case with no physical/forensic evidence, does the State violate Brady by... [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:41 am
Chaney v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:58 am
Which brings us to the idea of a so-called Article V convention assembled for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
