Search for: "State v. Spy"
Results 901 - 920
of 934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 11:16 am
In October 2004, the District of Columbia District Court appointed 14 Federal Defender offices to represent about 50 aliens detained as enemy combatants at the Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
Even the RCMP and CSIS need search warrants to spy on professors’ email. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
Kashmir, was a semi-autonomous princely state in 1947 operating outside of colonial law, soon to be drawn into a long drawn out international conflict between India and Pakistan with successive emergency regimes in both Indian and Pakistani administered Kashmir. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am
The Courts have since added that the conduct must be ‘oppressive and unreasonable’ (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:50 am
” y además a poner sus esfuerzos en detener la vigilancia masiva: bespiedonsniet.nl ("No Nos Espies"): bespiedonsniet.nl ("Don't Spy On Us"). [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
The following piece is adapted from my newly-released eCasebook “Cybersecurity Law, Policy, and Institutions” (v.3.1), which is available free and in full (270+ pages) in pdf format here. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:50 pm
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
