Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 3:30 pm
In Bates v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm
The case is Missouri v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 3:30 am
The litigation was consolidated in the Eighth Circuit (Iowa v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
At Monday’s oral argument in DePierre v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 7:46 pm
In the result, based on my examination of the Record in this application, I am not satisfied that a disposition that is fair and just to both parties on this issue can be made on the existing The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Doré v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:24 pm
Also, there's an obscure Thales v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm
… If a claim like this is filed originally in … state court, it can be removed, but if it comes into the state court in this strange sort of back-door way, then it has to stay in state court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:13 pm
At yesterday’s oral argument in Skinner v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
(Warren Distributing Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
For California employers, the Morris holding creates a strange current state of the law where arbitration agreements with class action waivers may be enforceable in state courts under the Iskanian ruling, but may not enforceable in federal court under the Morris v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:09 am
Strang at para. 14; b. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
Moreover, it sets up a strange set of circumstances where an expressive work could be considered protected speech for purposes of a Lanham Act federal false endorsement claim, but not for a state right of publicity claim, even though the two claims are highly similar, a fact that the Ninth Circuit itself acknowledged more than 20 years ago in Waits v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided to consider Timbs v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Litigation makes strange bedfellows, especially litigation about bedfellows. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
This is where strange bedfellows Thomas and Sotomayor jump out of the semantic sack. [read post]