Search for: "State v. Sweet" Results 901 - 920 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
Scruggs fee dispute, which led to the Balducci earwigging, which led to sweet potato time, which led to jail time). [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
The sweetness of his victory is limited, though, because Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Lots of new terms in the Scruggs matter -- sweet potatoes, earwigging, etc. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
Now, if you read this section of the transcript, it appears that Zach Scruggs did not know exactly what was meant by the Jones v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Staver thought well on his feet when Chief Justice George pointed to Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
  Why involve some sheik from Saudi Arabia, a London solicitor living in his Mum's basement and a couple former Congressmen to deliver a bushel of sweet potatoes? [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 12:59 pm
CNW Group states, The suit claims that the Defendants conspired to inflate the price oftheir products by 5% or more at least three times during the Class Period, inviolation of a variety of statutes including the Competition Act, and thevarious provincial Consumer Protection Acts. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:40 am
CNW Group states, The suit claims that the Defendants conspired to inflate the price of their products by 5% or more at least three times during the Class Period, in violation of a variety of statutes including the Competition Act, and the various provincial Consumer Protection Acts. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]