Search for: "Straight v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 2,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Jennifer Daskal
Conversely, however, a straight-up government win carries its own risks. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
 The Fourteenth Amendment and the Power of States to Ban Refugees 100 years ago this month, the Supreme Court decided Truax v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:44 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Read the North Carolina Supreme Court decision in Boseman v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 3:17 pm by Kevin
Yes, you have to do it with a straight face. crickets> C'mon. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm by Rick
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:18 am by James W. Ward
Ecolab relied on federal regulation CFR 778.210, which states that a percentage bonus based on straight time and overtime earnings satisfies federal overtime requirements. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm by Jason Rantanen
Research in Motion, Ltd. or transnational deals to sell inventions in the United States as in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
 You don’t need to acknowledge any amendment analogues, super-statutes, or non-Article V changes when you’ve got at least five straight-up Article V Amendments (leaving aside here Bruce’s powerful argument that the Reconstruction Amendments did not in fact satisfy the formal requirements of Article V). [read post]