Search for: "T. R. Joseph" Results 901 - 920 of 3,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 7:10 am by William Carleton
The study is called “'You Might Also Like:' Privacy Risks of Collaborative Filtering" and its authors are Joseph A. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 11:07 pm
It's too speculative: that the statement may have been true, which means she may have discussed it with Russert, which means Russert might have said something to Libby about Joseph Wilson's wife. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 7:16 am
According to the NYT, it's "the origin of the special counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election" and "the involvement of former Vice President Joseph R. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:50 pm by Joseph Margulies
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
9 May 2016, 9:48 am by Neumann Law Group
Most notably, the attorney stressed, the EMT testified that Boncore didn’t seem intoxicated at the time of the accident. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
From the states’ perspective, the Association of Food and Drug Officials’ Joseph Corby spoke of unprecedented cooperation. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:51 am by Michael Markarian
You might think we don’t agree on much with Senators Stouffer and Parson. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by Adam Thierer
As always, this year’s “State of the Net” conference features a variety of breakout sessions from which to choose and, sadly, until I figure out a way to clone myself, I can’t cover them all. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
So, I hope those of you aren't working celebrated by going out and finding something great by accident. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
There were 140 posts on the LexBlog Network today and I think this is the first time in awhile we don't have a post on the oil spill in the gulf, not that there weren't any worthy posts. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:27 am by Patrick
In other words, the judge acknowledged that the officer is free to tell as many lies as he can when not under oath, but that doesn't mean the judge has to believe him when he is under oath. [read post]