Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 901 - 920
of 4,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
In Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm P.L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
Johnston's opinion yesterday in Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Thomas Jefferson’s understanding of the Constitution and republicanism is understood in contrast to John Taylor’s and William Manning’s. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:05 pm
On May 1, 2020, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:30 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
La propuesta de Vázquez surge luego que la jueza Laura Taylor Swain le proveyera tres semanas al gobierno de Puerto Rico y a la Junta de Supervisión Fiscal (JSF) para que puedan llegar a un acuerdo sobre el pago que tendrían que hacer los municipios tras la eliminación de la Ley 29. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
She argued, and won, Buck v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 8:56 am
An example, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
In Bashin v. [read post]
