Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Francisco" Results 901 - 920 of 1,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
" In 2006, a federal judge in Morales v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:15 am
According to this report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Facebook have not commented how this will impact rival products such as Twitter's "What's Happening", MySpace's "What are you doing now? [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
The Volokh Conspiracy notes that tomorrow, at the annual convention of the American Constitution Society in Washington D.C., "there will be a panel on the impact of Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
And, notwithstanding the harsh language of those foul-mouthed justices on the Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court had never used the term in print.Until Thursday, that is.Justice Baxter pulled the trigger in the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:18 pm by Eric Muller
  They impair people’s vision and can motivate them to take extreme and unjustified measures to protect themselves. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm
It would have overturned a California Supreme Court decision, People v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:11 pm
Either way, state killing cannot resume until the issues are resolved.I applaud today's ruling, and I compliment all of the people who have worked so diligently to stop state killing in California. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
May, decided in 1987, and Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco factored into their decision to deploy troops to those two cities. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco factored into their decision to deploy troops to those two cities. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am by Amy Howe
Throw in the nearly half-million people who cross the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]