Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 901 - 920
of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
Well jolly good for all that.But he isn't the only one in the City of New York, and there just might be a few people walking down below near this spectacular landmark building that are stunned at the sight of a man parachuting down into one of the busiest places in Manhattan, and that they just might take their eyes off the taxis, busses and other vehicles flying by as they cross the street. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:04 am
The case is State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Companies who change online terms to include arbitration provisions would be wise to dot their i’s and cross their t’s in this regard. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
As long as Apple is not considered a monopolist (and under the Epic v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court crossed a lot off its to-do list in the last bunch of relisted cases. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:27 am
Boone v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
The claimant was cross-examined. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
., Habush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
The practice of tolerating discreet crosses on a necklace, and so on, common in Europe, could not be accepted. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Lord Garnier QC says the only reason the court would have agreed to cross-examination would be if it was satisfied that there was a prima facie case that the evidence was not true. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
The magistrate rejects Craigslist’s argument that its “conduct consisted of providing a neutral platform for people to post and search content on the internet. [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:15 am
This op-ed appeared on History News Network and in the Los Angeles Daily Journal, and is cross-posted on the Legal History Blog:The recent anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm
Because these people likely had an idea the documentation would later be used at trial, are these evidentiary items also "testimonial," thus triggering the right to cross examination? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:53 am
The Occupy people had just about had it with the wealth disparity in America. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
Several years ago, Gonzalez-Melchor gets caught crossing the border and admits that he's come over six or seven times before, so the immigration judge deports him -- denying him (and a ton of other people) voluntary departure because s/he's convinced he's just coming back anyway. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:08 pm
Second, Meredith Cross noted that many people at the SEC would like to take another run at proxy access after the Business Roundtable decision, but the SEC is too busy implementing Dodd Frank. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:02 pm
Even if you don't cross state lines. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
At least compared to the thousands of people who are currenly flying into San Diego this week. [read post]
