Search for: "Thomas v. Marshall"
Results 901 - 920
of 922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
In his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
For eleven stellar seasons, the CBS hit "The Jeffersons" told the hilarious story of George and Weezie, who had moved on up the socio-economic ladder to "a deluxe apartment in the sky. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Thomas also cites a few cases...Chief Justice Marshall, writing for the Court in Cohens v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
And the Court, relying on a 1974 precedent that had to do with drug rehab as an alternative to time in prison (Marshall v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
" Quoting from a 1974 ruling (Marshall v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Paul in the lawsuit are: Tom Campbell (R, CA), Dennis Kucinich (D, OH), Marcy Kaptur (D, OH), Roscoe Bartlett (R, MD), Bob Barr (R, GA), Dan Burton (R, IN), Philip Crane (R, IL), John Cooksey (R, LA), Walter Jones (R, NC), Donald Manzullo (R, IL), Charlie Norwood (R, GA), Thomas Petri (R, WI), Marshall Sanford (R, SC), Joe Scarborough (R, FL), Bob Schaffer (R, CO), and Thomas Tancredo (R, CO). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Sixty Famous Cases 10 v. (1956) Van Winkle, Marshall. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
Will Scalia, Thomas et al think it important? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 8:03 pm
The pairs he examines are: 1) John Marshall (M/P) and Thomas Jefferson (IPW) 2) John Marshall Harlan (M/P) and Oliver Wendell Holmes (IPW) 3) Hugo Black (M/P) and Melvin William Douglas (IPW) 4) William Rehnquist (M/P) and Antonin Scalia (IPW) Of these, the only ideologically pure warrior to have influenced constitutional law in the long run, according to Rosen, is Holmes, and only because he moderated his judicial philosophy in the 1920s. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:45 pm
v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:27 pm
(Justice Clarence Thomas said nothing.) [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 11:28 pm
To be sure, he didn't embrace the living Constitution as such, but nearly all of what he said as a matter of general jurisprudence could have been said by Ginsburg or Stevens, and much of it by Brennan or Marshall. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:40 am
Carys Craig, Osgoode Hall Law School, Beyond Author v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
(My discussion of Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Committee on Armed Services
Inns of Court: An Historical Description of the Inns of Court and Chancery of England
1 v. (1909) Ringrose, Hyacinthe
International Problems and Hague Conferences
1 v. (1908) Lawrence, Thomas Joseph.
Also available in the International Yearbooks Library
Latin Phrases and Maxims: Collected from the Institutional and Other Writers on Scotch Law
1 v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:24 am
Marshall for the state, and Gene C. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
Marshall v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
, Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, The Tribe of the Tiger, Norman E. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 3:52 pm
This question occurred to me when I recently reread Dickerson v. [read post]
