Search for: "U S v. JOHNS" Results 901 - 920 of 1,448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
  And this is how the federal district court judge who deal with law enforcement’s request for the warrant noted above described the facts available to him and the nature of the government’s request:In early 2013, unidentified persons gained unauthorized access to the personal email account of John Doe, an individual residing within the Southern District of Texas, and used that email address to access his local bank account. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
Frank Johns, Catherine Seal, Spencer Crona, Mary Joy Quinn, Howard S. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:01 am by admin
Some of the interesting competition and deceptive advertising highlights of the FTC’s new report include: - Enforcement statistics that include: enforcement actions that have focused on health care (31%), manufacturing (27%), pharmaceuticals (15%) and retail (14%); redress and disgorgement orders totaling $741.5 million; civil penalties totaling $63.6 million; and top consumer protection penalties of $478.9 million (John Beck), $40 million (Skechers USA, Inc.), $38.5 million… [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
O “véu corporativo” (separação da personalidade jurídica que muitas vezes impede de chegar à empresa matriz) é outro problema. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
O “véu corporativo” (separação da personalidade jurídica que muitas vezes impede de chegar à empresa matriz) é outro problema. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]