Search for: "U.S. v. Pena*"
Results 901 - 920
of 9,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
I bet the ERISA criminal penalty provisions are pretty harsh. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:18 pm
Far from an insignificant penalty.At least from the opinion, there's no particular dirt on Mr. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:39 am
It's a federal death penalty case on direct appeal. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:20 pm
I agree that when a statute says that a penalty of $20 a day "shall" be imposed upon a taxpayer that fails to timely file a tax return, except if there's a finding of reasonable cause, this penalty is mandatory. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
SWANSON No. 10-2178, U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
United States, 526 U.S. 813, 817 (1999) (same); Schad v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:04 pm
On June 25, the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:09 am
" Thus, the Second Circuit concluded, the U.S. is an "aggrieved party" for purposes of taking the appeal, despite the fact that it "may agree with the holding that the statute in question is unconstitutional" (citing INS v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Now retired U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:27 am
Griffith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
Litig., 2104 U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
Li, 2008 U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
Rick Wilson, drafter of the EU amicus brief in Roper v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Cisneros-Gutierrez, 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 4:37 am
In light of the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
Of particular importance, the Supreme Court held in Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
In the summary judgment order, Judge Michael Watson of the U.S. [read post]
