Search for: "UP-039 - State v. Day"
Results 901 - 920
of 10,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:30 pm
It's going to be an evening, ATL Digest for people who missed some of our content earlier in the day. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 3:59 am
Lewis v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am
For example, in my home state of Texas vendors are forbidden from selling any liquor on Sundays–a statute carried over from days of greater religious influence on secular law. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm
The first is United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:30 pm
First up on Monday morning is argument in Kahler v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
Speaking of Courthouse news, David Ovalle @Davidovalle305 reported on the quick Guilty Verdict Wednesday in state v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
That's the day on which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the parties' cross-appeal in San Francisco. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:12 pm
The case is Runzheimer Int'l Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
a gay rights doctrine (even though, as Carpenter points out, there are predecessors in United States v Moreno and Cleburne). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
To many of non-lawyers, "preemption" is that nefarious word associated with a network's decision to alter its television line-up with irksome breaking news. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:54 pm
There's been a lot happening over the last few days, both election and non-elected related -- too much to keep up with. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 2:02 pm
The First Circuit in Day v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 2:02 pm
The First Circuit in Day v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
While the state argued in the district court that "it is common knowledge that people that do not eat or drink for a day are still able to produce urine," the state does not advance that argument on appeal.Since Holland has shown that the hard-and-fast three-hour window substantially burdens his religious practices, to win the case, the state has to show that its policy is "reasonably related to legitimate penological interests," a lenient… [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
A few days later, Ms. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:20 am
Yesterday, the Business Court entered an important Order, titled "Order Regarding Notice of Designation and Assignment," in Southern Fastening Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:32 am
Didn't I say two days ago that these guys needed to get that book off Amazon, Informers In Your Midst: 10 Telltale Signs from Constantly Asking You To Speak Up To Wearing An FBI Sweatshirt? [read post]
