Search for: "US v. CLARK " Results 901 - 920 of 3,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
DuBois’ Black Reconstruction reminds us that there are books on Reconstruction by and for white people and books on Reconstruction by and for black people. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
The Board observed that, although the words in a word + design mark like applicant's are usually accorded greater weight, in this case opposer K-C's mark comprises only the image of a puppy with its paw on a roll of toilet paper, "so rather than using words to call for Opposer’s goods, consumers might identify Opposer’s brand another way, perhaps by recalling and mentioning the dog, or 'the puppy with toilet paper.'" Kimberly-Clark… [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Sabrina McCubbin summarized Jewel v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
When schools offer animal law courses and clinics, students graduate knowing that animal law is a serious social justice issue,” said [Kelly Levenda, student programs attorney at the Animal Legal Defense Fund, a California-based nonprofit law firm that advocates for greater legal protections for animals].How would you resolve Bees v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
When Greg Clark stepped down as the leader of the Alberta Party Ms Soapbox wondered whether the party had lost its mind. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Liisa Speaker
People v Bahoda, 448 Mich 261, 292 n 64; 531 NW2d 659 (1995). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am by Stephen Pitel
Three judges (Hale, Wilson, Clarke) retain the traditional broad common law view – the position in many Canadian provinces prior to Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (available here) – that ongoing suffering in the forum in respect of a tort that happened abroad is sufficient. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Laws LJ explained why in Marshalls Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield, Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd [2004] ICR 1502 at [32]: The rules of precedent or stare decisis cognisable here are given by the common law . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
Douglas and Tom Clark recused; Justices Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, an [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site’s contact form. [read post]