Search for: "US v. Jordan" Results 901 - 920 of 1,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Adam Schlossman
Warley and residential segregation –David Bernstein, professor at George Mason University School of Law Podcast with Vernon Jordan, former president of the National Urban League and civil rights litigator (topic TBA) Week 3 Podcast: “The Unexpected Consequences of Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
Jordan, in comparison, took 402 days to reach that milestone. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:49 am by familoo
Unusually, it can be found on Jordans Family Law but not on BAILII (or at any rate it doesn’t come up with the citation search function). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:14 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Thompson filed a federal civil rights suit, winning a $14 million verdict which was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit, only to have it overturned by the US Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:45 pm by Ellena Erskine
Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said the committee should instead be investigating the leak of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Massachusetts Issue: Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm by Zoe Tillman
His Supreme Court work included defending affirmative action policies in several landmark cases, including 2003’s Gratz v. [read post]