Search for: "US v. London" Results 901 - 920 of 3,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 1:05 am by Jim Walker
International law also requires that only "proportional" force may be used in the face of violent resistance. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The December 2010 issue of Engage features not one but two items written by members of the Somin family: a debate on Kelo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
The IPKat has just been reading some fascinating data which has been issued on behalf of London and Milton Keynes-based law firm EMW Picton Howell. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:58 am
A recent ruling from the English Commercial Court illuminates one risk with the use of the Bermuda form arbitration clause:  if the losing party is dissatisfied with the arbitration result, it may not be permitted to challenge the result under New York law in a New York court, but may instead be limited to challenging the arbitration award under English law in English court.In the case, C v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Thomas Leonard of Kilburn & Strode LLP, London The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued his opinion in C-364/131, and in doing so has provided hope for the patentability of embryonic stem cells in Europe. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
 EventsIn the framework of the Intellectual Property Law research seminar series 2019, the CCLFR and the University of Reading will host, on 30 January 2019, 14:00-15:00, Palmer 102, Dr Enrico Bonadio (City, University of London) with the seminar “Restricting the Use of Brands to protect Health: The Latest Developments”. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Farah Mukaddam (UK)
  This article was prepared by Farah Mukaddam (Farah.Mukaddam@nortonrosefulbright.com) of Norton Rose Fulbright’s (London) Dispute resolution group. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  The HHJ uses Eastlands Homes v Whyte [2010] EWHC 695 (QB), at [65], as the basis for this outcome. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  The HHJ uses Eastlands Homes v Whyte [2010] EWHC 695 (QB), at [65], as the basis for this outcome. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
Guest Kat Eibhlin answers the question by analyzing the recent decision Generics (U.K) v Yeda, a practical application of the Supreme Court’s Actavis v Eli Lilly.Internet and Digital Media Law conference returns to London! [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The use of the colours red, blue and/or black against a shiny/metallic finish. [read post]