Search for: "United States of America v. Hand"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Miller claimed that plaintiff advanced towards him, and he mistook an Xbox controller in plaintiff's hand for a handgun. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
You just suggested what the plain text of the consent decree states unequivocally is prohibited conduct! [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
” The anchor declared that the attackers had earned “the evil distinction of having perpetrated a criminal outrage almost unique in America’s history. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm
The U.S. government filed a civil-forfeiture action in which the named defendants were the objects themselves: The United States of America v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm
The U.S. government filed a civil-forfeiture action in which the named defendants were the objects themselves: The United States of America v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:51 pm
In addition, in the absence of any reference in the agreement to a “Beth Din,” the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the appointment of a religious tribunal ( Sieger v Sieger, 297 AD2d 33 [2d Dept 2002]). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:23 am
United Services Association of America. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs claimed that, had Telmex honored their right to negotiate an exchange of their Conecel units for America Movil shares, plaintiffs would have owned America Movil shares worth more than $1 billion as of May 30, 2008 (the date of the complaint). [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:03 am
CoreCivic, the case would have instead been United States of America ex rel Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
United States, Justice Gorsuch issued a 33 page manifesto, cast as a dissenting opinion, dismissing Scalia’s deferential perspective as a “blank check” to federal bureaucrats. [read post]
