Search for: "United States of America v. In the Matter of the Application of the United States" Results 901 - 920 of 1,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm by Jason C. Brown
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Ros Roca, S.A (EPLAW) About trade mark law, the Guggenheim museum and ‘tapas’ (not kidding) - Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed by owner of ‘Guggenheim’ Spanish trademarks against registration of ‘El heuvo frito Indautxu El Heuvonheim’ (Class 46) Supreme Court: On well known marks: size does matter: Judgment no 761/2009 (Class 46)   United Kingdom UK Liberal Democrats demand ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) Court of Appeal reverses… [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
The respondent is a businessman and citizen of the United States of America and now resides in South Africa. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 8:36 am by Viktor Hohlacov
In particular, a more laissez-faire approach to anti-trust enforcement in the United States under the new Trump administration is expected to fuel activism. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court Oregon: ‘Confidential’ accusation creates substantial controversy sufficient to exercise subject matter jurisdiction: Google Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
  That judgment of legitimacy itself is made more powerful when it is used as a presumption for the application of the noninterference and recognition principles of inter-institutional relations (see, e.g., here, and here). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]