Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 901 - 920
of 7,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
(“Hospira”) appeals from the judgment ofthe United States District Court for the Northern Districtof Illinois that claim 6 of U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:59 am
Hunters Friend Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
Yesterday the court ruled 5-4 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Trinity Indus., Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
United States, 74 Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:17 am
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, a recent cert. petition that asks the Court to decide whether states can protect the right of unions to picket on private property even when a business owner, the property owner, doesn’t want them there; the Justices are scheduled to consider the case at their June 6 Conference. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm
Avis Budget Grp., Inc. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:41 am
Facts: This case (ADT LLC, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:11 am
Facts: This case (Kerek v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:29 am
Howard Berger Company, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Tennessee – December 27th, 2016) involves the death of an individual when a fire erupted in a traveling camper. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:49 am
See Minstar, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Mandatory-minimum statutes generate some of the worst injustices in federal sentencing: a situation not helped by Judge Beezer's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:47 am
Although defendants in customs penalty cases are entitled to a jury trial on whether or not they are liable for a violation, the amount of the penalty is not a question for the jury.So says the Court of International Trade in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm
… by the United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol …. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
” Id. citing MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
” Id. citing MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
See Mango v. [read post]
