Search for: "United States v. Alaska"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Alaska Stat. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 9:39 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
In Perry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Alaska Nat. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:16 pm
Both the Uniform Partnership Act and Uniform Limited Partnership Act in the United States borrowed the charging order concept from England's Partnership Act of 1890. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
United States, 295 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:31 am
United States], 505 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
It wrote cautiously in general: We do not decide the status of other Government employees, nor do we decide whether “lesser functionaries subordinate to officers of the United States” must be subject to the same sortof control as those who exercise “significant authority pursuant to the laws. [read post]
