Search for: "United States v. Arenas"
Results 901 - 920
of 924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
United States In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:02 am
Per Mwani v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
And while he seems more open to embracing a positive vision of race and thinking about the state's inevitable role in constructing identity, his vision may also be more tied to context and less generalizable across cases.In my view, the story of Kennedy's opinion in the desegregation cases began not with Bakke or Grutter, but with a voting-rights decision issued last year in a case called League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
The administration and the country paid the price for that - and still are.On the other hand, I have been surprised and dismayed by the public vehemence with which some JAGs have fought the very idea of military commissions - highly invested, as Jack Goldsmith observes in his new book in the arena to which they are accustomed as criminal lawyers, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and seeking and finding support among NGOs, military law groups, and other places outside the structure of… [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
In Board of Educ., etc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:59 pm
(The case is U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:45 am
On the very last day, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
The Court's 1979 decision in United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
United States, No. 06-6330, justifiably received a lot of attention (see here) because it appears that SCOTUS is finally going to get involved in the long-standing debate over crack sentencing (which has hit new heights since Booker). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:20 am
United States (2000), and siding with sister courts in recent decisions in the 8th., 9th., and 11th. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
Washington), the United States Supreme Court elevated the concept to a new level of doctrinal prominence. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
Surely, it will be argued, the United States is TRIPS-compliant as the leading proponent and creator of the TRIPS; hence, if eBay is the law of the United States, it presents a model of TRIPS-compliance for any country to follow. [read post]
