Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 901 - 920 of 16,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Argument was held on May 10, 2011 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tapscott
On July 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) in Uniloc 2017, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:29 am
The American Immigration Lawyers Association has reported that the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has ruled that Immigration Judges maintain the authority to make a finding that an application for asylum in frivolous even where the application for asylum is time-barred because it was not filed within one-year of the applicant's last arrival to the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 08-10100 ________________________ D. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:36 am by Beth Graham
  After stating the court would reach the same result regardless of which proffered standard of review was used, the Fifth Circuit relied on its 2016 decision in Reyna v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:19 am by Orin Kerr
United States, that has a fascinating set of opinions. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:31 am by Marcia Oddi
Collins (ND Ind., Van Bokkelen), a 14-page opinion, Judge Herndon, Chief Judge, United States District Court... [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:35 pm
Broadcom Corp., No. 05-CV-1958-B (BLM), United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. 2008-1348, 1381 & 1382, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit In May 2008, Qualcomm filed an appeal in the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am by Vikram David Amar
Last week, a venerable three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a well-intentioned but analytically confounding ruling in a highly contentious dispute between the federal government and the State of Missouri. [read post]