Search for: "United States v. Clark" Results 901 - 920 of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951), and The Steel Seizure Case, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).Minton had the good sense to leave after seven years on the Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
What the institute was saying is that the capital justice system in the United States is irretrievably broken. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Phil Dixon
This prompted the prosecutor to check with the United States Attorney’s office. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am by SHG
United States v Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dunsmuir is — by some distance — the most cited decision of any Canadian court and, for Canadians and Canadaphiles, synonymous with… The Lean Law FirmSmall Firms, Big Issues: Highlights of Thomson Reuters’ 2017 State of US Small Law Firms Survey More than half of all lawyers in the United States and Canada work in small firms of less than 30 people. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:03 pm by John Elwood
Alix notes that the brief the United States filed in the Servotronics case asserted that “whether Section 1782 authorizes assistance for use in investor-state arbitration” was “a question of particular concern to the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]