Search for: "United States v. Edward" Results 901 - 920 of 2,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Allied Stores Int’l, Inc., as well as by the United States Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has approached leading American journalists for their views on the British Press and the differences in between journalism in the United States and journalism in the UK . [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
There are instructive parallels, he argues, between the imperialism of "old Europe" (not his phrase) and that of Japan, and of the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
  Lane is not the only one to argue that the Eleventh Circuit’s categorical exclusion of First Amendment protection for subpoenaed testimony is incorrect:  the Solicitor General, representing the United States as an amicus, agrees with him. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 20-291Issue: Whether the term “covered offense” in the First Step Act of 2018 includes violations of 21 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Alcon Lensx, Inc., No. 16-48 (limits on arbitrator autonomy in patent cases) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]