Search for: "United States v. Edward" Results 901 - 920 of 2,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States In the Hulk Hogan case Gawker has filed motions seeking a new trial. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:33 am by Kathy Darvil
  To see the complete list of resources on U.S. presidential elections, search the SARA catalog for the Library of Congress subjects, Presidents—United States—Elections. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am by Tom B
Dustin was still Chair at the time and my friend Kate Edwards was coming on as the new Executive Director. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:14 am by Andrew Hamm
The day before the Court released its 1919 opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm by Evan Lee
United States ended in a result readily understandable to the non-technical observer: the convicted sex offender lost. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am by Andres
Because he lives in Europe, he was concerned that his personal data would be sent to the United States, and he wanted European regulators to stop such a transfer. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by SHG
Europe isn’t the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s Note: Thanks to Portland, OR attorney Edward Sullivan for this post. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]