Search for: "United States v. Edwards"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
He is also incorrect to suggest that it makes any difference whether an appellate court, when rejecting an Edwards v Bairstow challenge, expresses its agreement with the conclusion of the fact-finding tribunal or states only that the tribunal was entitled to reach that conclusion on the material before it. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
(quoting Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Emily Watkins, Damon Dawain Edwards, Edward J. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am
United States had the earmarks of the latter. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Wiretap Applications Did Not Need to Allege Probable Cause That Controlled Substance Was in Khat Leaves United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:14 am
On September 28, 2021, Judge Edward M. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 11:11 am
Their first joint complaint was dismissed by Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, but without prejudice, and the plaintiffs brought an amended complaint. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
