Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 901 - 920
of 31,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
United States is sure to be appealed, though there is a reasonable chance it will be upheld, especially by the conservative leaning Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
As you have undoubtedly heard by now, on June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
”) State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm
On Monday, CAAF released it’s fourth opinion of the term in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:46 am
United States”: Orin Kerr has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy” about a ruling that a three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2007, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:14 pm
Ashby, No. 08-0770/MC, and United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:19 am
On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the case of Maurice Walker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
See National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:55 am
But United States District Court Judge John Gleeson of the Eastern District of New York could make me eat my words. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
On Friday, a two-judge panel of the High Court of Justice decided R (Saadoon & Mufdhi) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The impact of the federal judge’s decision is to remove the WOTUS rule from 24 states. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:54 am
CAAF today published its opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 10:01 pm
’” In Jones v. [read post]
