Search for: "United States v. Kennedy"
Results 901 - 920
of 4,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
President Truman’s initial decision not to recognize the sovereignty of any state over Jerusalem seems much more clearly within the nexus of attributes covered by recognition than, say, the claims settlement mechanism memorialized in the Litvinov Assignment that United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
The transcript of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
At oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
United States No. 08-1322, Astrue v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
Nobody endorsed this test (both parties and the United States argued against it). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:04 pm
United States or United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Stanford student Anthony Dick summarizes Monday’s argument in Horne v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
This was evident in the fact that the birth rate in the United States fell dramatically from 1800 to 1900. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:12 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), is an fascinating decision. [read post]
