Search for: "United States v. Levi"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Facebook awarded US patent for ‘news feed’ technology (Daily Dose of IP) (Tangible IP) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Arcade) (BlawgIT) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) 9th Circuit: Domains are property subject to levy where the registry is located Office Depot v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
Second, it allows creditors to proceed against domain names where the registry is located, thus allowing creditors to proceed against domain names in one proceeding and more importantly levy against domain names located abroad (where the registry is located in the United States). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
Second, it allows creditors to proceed against domain names where the registry is located, thus allowing creditors to proceed against domain names in one proceeding and more importantly levy against domain names located abroad (where the registry is located in the United States). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am
See Qualls v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Second, it allows creditors to proceed against domain names where the registry is located, thus allowing creditors to proceed against domain names in one proceeding and more importantly levy against domain names located abroad (where the registry is located in the United States). [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:59 pm
If there is no in personam jurisdiction in any judicial district of the United States, the owner may proceed in rem against the allegedly infringing domain name. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
” Briefly: At the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Levi Pulkkinen reports on the petitioners’ brief filed yesterday in Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
Then it will discuss the history of voter access in the United States, with a focus on Harper v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:29 pm
Recently HEATHCOTE HOLDINGS CORP, INC filed a complaint (.PDF) claiming false patent marking against CRAYOLA LLC in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Levy, and presents a 1999 article, A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemption. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm
Had enough of the Supreme Court this week, what with the SOTUgate and more fallout from the Citizens United case? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:49 pm
The United States Court in Miranda v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
” Solicitor General’s PerspectiveMalcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting neither party’s theory. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:18 am
Levie v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Congress over the past few decades to make it more and more difficult for an individual to be granted refugee status in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:42 pm
This was the first time the Second Circuit applied the considerations for the implied preclusion of antitrust laws by the securities laws outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
This was the first time the Second Circuit applied the considerations for the implied preclusion of antitrust laws by the securities laws outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
The case of Levy v. [read post]
