Search for: "United States v. May" Results 901 - 920 of 49,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 11:26 am
According to this Appeals Chamber decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:27 pm by bradhendrickslawfirm
The United States Supreme Court announced today, March 20, 2012, that state employees may not sue a State employer for monetary damages related to violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 1152-such that the federal government may prosecute Indians for virtually any state-law offense committed in Indian country, including on lands promised by treaty for the “exclusive use” of Indian tribes.Lower court materials here. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 12:26 pm by Allan Blutstein
United States, 338 U.S. 189 (1949), and Molinaro v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
 303 Creative may do precisely that, and may even undermine the First Amendment’s tiers of scrutiny in the process, though it need not address Sullivan. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:33 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
On remand, the Eighth Circuit again reversed Spears’ sentence and remanded for resentencing. concluding, again, that the district court "may not categorically reject the ratio set forth by the Guidelines,"and replace the 100:1 quantity ratio inherent in the advisory Guidelines range with a 20:1 quantity ratio. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:31 am by Brian Wolfman
Barnes says that the Supreme Court may just summarily reverse the Montana decision on the basis of Citizens United. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a few times about the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]