Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 901 - 920 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  The first three paragraphs of the opinion explain his reasoning: On June 26, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by David Markus
Attorneys Award for “Superior Litigation Team” in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a Michigan federal district court issued a preliminary injunction preventing Iraqi nationals (many of whom are Chaldean Christians) subject to long-standing deportation orders from being removed from the United States while they attempt to convince immigration courts that their return will subject them to persecution, torture and possible death. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm by Michael Madison
They have tended to focus on two main aspects of this interface: innovative legal-tech and interdisciplinary collaboration between law schools and STEM-oriented units. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by FM Librarian
Non-Refoulement, Socio-Economic Deprivation, and Paposhvili v Belgium," International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 29, no. 4 (Dec. 2017)- Preprint version of article. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-5876 (Michigan’s), and Weston v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am by Ad Law Defense
  It did so on the basis of its allegation that the listing mechanism violated the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]