Search for: "United States v. Murphy"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
” (Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
Read more: Terror advice decision causes uproar in United States, but could it happen here? [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am
" The applicant claimed that these questions violated his rights under the Texas and United States Constitutions against self-incrimination. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Not surprisingly, Macumber was convicted and sentenced to life.I don't know how many factually innocent people are in prison in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Murphy, 521 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Litella's catchphrase when I read the Appellate Division, Second Department's important decision last week affirming the trial court's key stock valuation rulings, in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 2010 NY Slip Op 04794 (2d Dept June 1, 2010). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:59 pm
See: Murphy v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:43 pm
That opinion was later withdrawn after the local United States Attorney wrote a motion taking responsibility for failing to train the young prosecutor, and begging that the young Assistant United State's Attorney's name be stricken from the Federal Reporter. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:34 am
United States, 314 U.S. 583 (1941) and North American Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
