Search for: "United States v. One Package"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Corporate Culture That Weighs Against Hobby Lobby Being a Religious Entity RFRA was not the first statute ever enacted in the United States and must be considered in light of entrenched understandings of law that preceded it. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
One such novella bears the boring title State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
“Incentives” include compensation (salary, bonuses, benefits packages, and employee-specific perks) and working conditions. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 8:26 am
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Legally marketed also means that the predicate cannot be one that is in violation of the Act. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al v John T… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:44 am
On , United States Letters Patent No. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 12:07 pm
The offense can be committed within one state. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
The chance of a bad public relations issue arising can be lessened by: 1) disclosing what the array of virtual items includes; 2) selling packages of multiple items as one “unit” rather than selling items individually; and 3) packaging the items such that a buyer has a good idea of the nature of the items (e.g., packaging the items by game) rather than making random packages of items. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
The chance of a bad public relations issue arising can be lessened by: 1) disclosing what the array of virtual items includes; 2) selling packages of multiple items as one “unit” rather than selling items individually; and 3) packaging the items such that a buyer has a good idea of the nature of the items (e.g., packaging the items by game) rather than making random packages of items. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:39 am
(IP Law Chat) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Second Circuit personal jurisdiction: Chloe v Queen Bee – One trap sale ‘Might well be’ sufficient (Trademark Blog) [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Graffiti was sprayed on the front gates and intercom unit, with the house sign beside it defaced with red spray paint. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
