Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 901 - 920
of 5,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
The increasing consolidation has attracted scrutiny from the United States Department of Justice since 2019 (many have critiqued the DOJ’s involvement as animus from then Attorney General William Barr). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:29 am
United States, 59 Fed. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:18 am
FINRA’s Dispute Resolution forum handles nearly all of the securities-related arbitrations and mediations in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
” Recognizing that SEPs confer market power, and that patent hold up by SEP owners can stifle competition and lead to higher prices, the DOJ and the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued its first SEP Remedies Policy Statement on Remedies for SEPs in 2013 that made the common-sense observation that an SEP owner who seeks to enjoin or exclude on the basis of licensing terms that are “incompatible” with its voluntary FRAND commitments may… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Unfortunately, this price reduction for consumers was partially offset by higher taxes. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
” The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
– United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
What the Court said in Galloway v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Grundman v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Indeed, Core has stated that it ‘expects to rely on Qualcomm source code for most, if not all, of the thirteen standard-essential patents asserted against LG. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
"Royalty base: Ericsson argues that the price of the end product (in this case, the insanely overpriced iPhone) needs to be considered in a FRAND determination. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:47 pm
ATI is an outpatient physical therapy company that operates clinics across the United States, and went public after being acquired by Fortress. [read post]
