Search for: "United States v. San Francisco" Results 901 - 920 of 1,670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
Last year Senator Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, introduced a similar bill, SB 184, which died in the Senate due to lack of support. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In the 50s, we defended Allen Ginsberg and Lawrence Ferlinghetti in San Francisco's attempt to suppress the gay content of Ginsberg's Howl. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Don Maurice
Hat tip to our friends at Simmonds & Narita, LLP in San Francisco who handled the defense. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Charles Rubin
Although petitioner was in San Francisco when the notice was mailed and delivered, her status as a person “outside of the United States” is largely a function of her residency and is not vitiated by her brief presence in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Charles Rubin
Although petitioner was in San Francisco when the notice was mailed and delivered, her status as a person “outside of the United States” is largely a function of her residency and is not vitiated by her brief presence in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
The Court could order divided argument and invite either San Francisco or California to participate on that issue. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
I, III, IV and V could be changed and have the resulting entity still be worthy of the name "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm by Wells Bennett
  And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
  Since 2008, numerous personhood initiatives have sprung up throughout the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm by admin
INA 212 (9)(B)(v) provides for the waiver of the three and ten year bar only for an individual “who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:21 pm by admin
INA 212 (9)(B)(v) provides for the waiver of the three and ten year bar only for an individual “who is the spouse or son or daughter of a United States citizen. [read post]